AI Vendor Due Diligence: Lessons from BigBear.ai’s Debt Reset and FedRAMP Move

Hook: Why procurement teams must learn from BigBear.ai in 2026

Procurement leads and small business operators are under pressure to source enterprise-grade AI vendors fast — but speed without rigor invites operational, financial, and compliance risk. BigBear.ai’s late-2025 debt elimination and its acquisition of a FedRAMP-approved AI platform spotlight a hard lesson: certifications alone don’t replace financial stability or customer-concentration analysis. Use the practical due diligence framework below to shorten procurement cycles while reducing vendor risk.

Executive summary — the bottom line first

In early 2026, government and commercial buyers face three converging forces: rising regulatory scrutiny of AI, stronger demand for FedRAMP and cloud authorization, and heightened investor focus on vendor balance sheets post-market corrections (2022–2025). BigBear.ai’s steps — eliminating debt and acquiring FedRAMP capability — improve its market positioning but also raise classic procurement questions: Was the purchase defensive? Does the company still show declining revenue or customer concentration in federal contracts? Can the vendor sustain SLAs if a top customer pauses work? Your immediate procurement priorities should be:

• Verify financial health beyond headlines: audited statements, cash runway, debt covenants.
• Confirm certifications & authorizations with artifacts (FedRAMP package, ATO letters, SOC 2, ISO).
• Quantify customer concentration risk and contingency plans for loss of a single large customer.

Why BigBear.ai is a useful case study for AI vendor due diligence

BigBear.ai’s 2025 moves are not unique — many AI vendors are chasing FedRAMP and shoring up balance sheets to access federal business. However, the company also reported revenue pressure in recent periods. That combination is instructive: buying a certified platform can open doors to government contracts, but certification does not eliminate the need to evaluate cash flow, recurring revenue quality, and customer concentration. Procurement teams must treat FedRAMP as an access enabler, not a risk mitigator.

Key signals from the BigBear.ai example

• Debt elimination reduces bankruptcy risk, but check whether it came with equity dilution or onerous terms.
• Acquiring FedRAMP capability accelerates federal access — request the full FedRAMP authorization package and scope.
• Falling revenue warns of churn or contract timing issues; insist on pipeline evidence and retention metrics.

FedRAMP opens doors. Financial resilience keeps them open.

2026 landscape — what’s changed and why it matters

Several developments through late 2025 and into 2026 should reshape vendor screening:

• FedRAMP adoption accelerated as federal agencies funded AI modernization, creating more demand for FedRAMP-authorized cloud AI platforms.
• NIST and international AI standards matured; buyers ask for model risk management and documentation aligned to NIST AI RMF and ISO guidance.
• Investor discipline tightened; publicly traded AI vendors have had to prioritize cash flow and liability reduction.
• Supply-chain and subcontractor scrutiny increased — agencies expect visibility into subprocessor relationships and third-party code provenance.

Core due diligence pillars: What to verify, and how

Evaluate vendors across seven pillars. For each, the checklist below includes verifiable artifacts and red flags.

1) Financial health

• Request audited financial statements (last 3 years) and latest interim management accounts.
• Check liquidity metrics: cash on hand, 12-month runway, burn rate, and accounts receivable aging.
• Review debt covenants and any recent debt restructuring (e.g., debt elimination transactions). Ask for the term sheet and dilution effects.
• Obtain a revenue breakdown by contract and customer (top 10 customers by ARR). Red flag: >30% revenue from a single customer without documented contingency plans.
• Ask for pipeline evidence and conversion assumptions for forecasted revenue supporting bid pricing and resource allocation.

2) Certifications & authorizations (FedRAMP focus)

• Obtain the FedRAMP Authorization to Operate (ATO) package, including the SSP (System Security Plan), SAR (Security Assessment Report), and POA&M (Plan of Action & Milestones).
• Confirm the FedRAMP authorization scope: is it FedRAMP Moderate or High? Which tenants/environments are in-scope?
• Validate the authorizing agency or JAB involvement; ask about the expiration and reauthorization cadence.
• Cross-check other security certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. For defense or controlled unclassified information (CUI), ask about CMMC alignment or ITAR controls.
• Request third-party penetration test reports and remediation evidence. Red flag: refusal to share test artifacts under NDA.

3) Customer concentration & contractual dependency

• Get a customer revenue concentration table and ask for contract lengths and renewal rates.
• Confirm clauses that could pause delivery (e.g., stop-work, contingent funding) and vendor remedies for lost revenue.
• Assess dependency on single-customer customization — heavy customization increases switching costs and risk.
• Verify whether key technology or data is owned by the customer or the vendor, and who retains IP after contract termination.

4) Operational security & data governance

• Request the data flow diagrams, data classification policy, and data retention/destruction procedures.
• Confirm encryption in transit and at rest, key management, and whether keys are customer-managed or vendor-managed.
• Assess model training data provenance and PII handling. For government contracts, verify CUI/Controlled data controls.
• Ask for incident response playbooks and recent breach history. Verify notification timelines in contracts.

5) Technology & model risk

• Require model cards, validation reports, and explainability artifacts for production models in scope; for automated metadata workflows see automating metadata extraction with modern models where applicable.
• Confirm procedures for model retraining, drift detection, and rollback mechanisms.
• Ask about third-party models or open-source components and supply-chain controls for them — review the latest open-source tool assessments to understand trustworthy components.
• Review licensing: commercial open-source licenses, third-party API dependencies, and export controls.

6) Commercial terms, SLAs & exit planning

• Negotiate SLAs with measurable KPIs: availability, latency, support response times, and data recovery RTO/RPO.
• Define clear exit provisions: data export formats, migration assistance, escrow for critical components, and source-code escrow if appropriate.
• Include price protection and service credits tied to SLAs; avoid open-ended indexing without caps.

7) Insurance & indemnities

• Verify cyber insurance coverage and limits that match your contract exposure.
• Confirm professional liability coverage for algorithmic errors, regulatory fines, and privacy breaches.
• Request certificates of insurance and policy schedules that list exclusions.

AI vendor procurement checklist — a step-by-step workflow

Use this checklist to move from initial screen to contract signature in a risk-aware way. Each item maps to a minimal artifact or evidence requirement.

1. Initial screen: public filings, press releases (e.g., debt elimination, M&A), and third-party reviews. Require a short vendor one-pager including FedRAMP status and customer concentration summary.
2. Security & compliance checkpoint: request SOC 2 report, FedRAMP SSP, and sample pen-test report. Put these behind NDA if necessary.
3. Financial validation: request audited financials and top-customer revenue breakdown. If the vendor is private, require a limited-scope financial statement review and bank reference.
4. Commercial & SLA negotiation: define KPIs, price, and exit terms. Insist on data export and continuity clauses in the SOW.
5. Legal & procurement sign-off: verify indemnities, IP rights, and export-control compliance for AI models and data.
6. Onboarding & continuous monitoring: schedule quarterly security reviews and access to incident logs, with automated telemetry for SLA monitoring — consider hybrid approaches from hybrid edge workflows to reduce vendor-side cloud dependency.

Actionable due diligence questions you should ask every AI vendor

These are short, procurement-ready questions to include in RFPs or security questionnaires.

• Provide your latest audited financial statements and a top-10 customer revenue table for the last 24 months.
• Share the FedRAMP authorization package (SSP, SAR, POA&M) and confirm the scope and expiration date.
• List subcontractors and subprocessors used in the FedRAMP-authorized environment; provide SOC 2 reports for critical subs.
• Describe your model validation process and provide example model cards for production models supporting our scope.
• List all ongoing government contracts that represent >10% of ARR and provide contingency plans for contract pauses or terminations.
• Provide details of cyber insurance, including policy limits and exclusions relevant to AI/algorithmic risk.

Risk scoring framework — how to rank vendors fast

Create a weighted scoring model that maps to your risk tolerance. Example weightings (customize per procurement):

• Financial health: 25%
• Security & certifications (FedRAMP, SOC 2): 20%
• Customer concentration & contract dependency: 15%
• Operational maturity & incident history: 15%
• Model governance & explainability: 15%
• Commercial terms & exit planning: 10%

Set pass/fail gates: e.g., any vendor with >30% revenue concentration and <12 months cash runway fails financial gate regardless of FedRAMP status.

Contract clauses to mitigate concentration & financial risk

Include these contract provisions to protect your organization if your vendor faces financial stress or loses a major customer:

• Change-of-control triggers allowing renegotiation or termination if vendor is acquired under distress.
• Financial covenants requiring notification of material adverse changes and audited financial delivery schedules.
• Escrow of critical source code and configuration for FedRAMP components to ensure continuity for federal workloads.
• Graduated transition assistance fees and milestone-based payments to fund migration if the vendor exits the market.

Continuous monitoring — procurement doesn’t end at signature

Establish a monitoring cadence to detect early warnings:

• Quarterly security posture refresh: updated SSAE/SOC reports, FedRAMP reauthorization status, and POA&M progress.
• Monthly financial health check-ins for high-risk vendors: cash runway, accounts receivable, and top-customer renewals.
• Automated alerts for SLA breaches and anomalous usage patterns tied to exfiltration or model drift.
• Annual tabletop exercises simulating vendor disruption and cutover to contingency plans.

2026 predictions — what procurement teams should prepare for now

• More vendors will claim FedRAMP readiness; demand the FedRAMP package and ATO evidence instead of self-attestation.
• Model governance will become a procurement priority; expect RFPs to require NIST AI RMF alignment and explainability documentation.
• Financial transparency will be non-negotiable in large contracts — buyers will demand escrow and stronger termination protections.
• Subcontractor risk and open-source supply chain audits will be standard parts of the security review; for practical guidance on tracing third-party components and domains see domain due diligence best practices.

Common red flags — stop the process if you see these

• Refusal to provide FedRAMP artifacts, SOC 2 reports, or penetration test results under NDA.
• Unwillingness to share top-customer revenue concentration or to provide contingency plans for large customer loss.
• Audited financial statements missing or not reconciled to disclosures — or a cash runway under 12 months without a credible recovery plan.
• Opaque third-party dependencies, especially for model training or critical cloud infrastructure components.

Practical example: How to apply the framework to BigBear.ai-like vendors

If a vendor has public headlines about debt elimination and a FedRAMP acquisition, take these steps:

1. Request the debt restructuring documents to understand covenant trade-offs and dilution.
2. Ask for the full FedRAMP package and confirm which services and environments are authorized.
3. Obtain a customer revenue schedule and run the concentration test. If one government contract equals >30% ARR, require an escrow and transition plan.
4. Negotiate a 12–18 month monitoring clause with financial reporting monthly until runway and revenue stability are proven.

Final takeaways — procurement rules for 2026

• Don’t let certifications lull you into complacency. FedRAMP is critical for federal access but doesn’t replace financial and concentration diligence.
• Quantify concentration. Anything above 30% from a single customer requires contingency planning and escrow protections.
• Score vendors holistically. Use a weighted model that includes financial metrics, certifications, operations, and model governance.
• Make monitoring mandatory. Procurement is continuous — plan quarterly audits, automated SLAs, and exit rehearsals.

Call to action

Need a tailored AI vendor due diligence pack (RFP template, scoring spreadsheet, and contract clause library) that maps to this framework? Contact our procurement advisory team for a hands-on review of your top AI vendor shortlist or download the ready-to-use checklist to start closing deals faster with lower risk.

Related Reading

• Edge-First Patterns for 2026 Cloud Architectures: Integrating DERs, Low‑Latency ML and Provenance
• Why On‑Device AI Is Now Essential for Secure Personal Data Forms (2026 Playbook)
• Field Guide: Hybrid Edge Workflows for Productivity Tools in 2026
• Playbook: What to Do When X/Other Major Platforms Go Down — Notification and Recipient Safety
• Franchise Your Training Method: What Filoni’s New Star Wars Slate Tells Coaches About Productizing Programs
• Reducing Developer Context Switching: Consolidating Chat, Micro Apps, and CRM Integrations
• Using Podcasts for Research: How 'The Secret World of Roald Dahl' Models Investigative Listening
• Top 10 Accessories to Pair With a New Mac mini M4 (and Which Ones Are Worth the Discount)
• How to Build a Cozy Night-In: Lighting, Hot-Water Bottles, and the Perfect Evening Scent