SaaS Inventory Template: How to Identify Underused Tools and Measure Value
toolsSaaSoperations

SaaS Inventory Template: How to Identify Underused Tools and Measure Value

UUnknown
2026-02-17
8 min read
Advertisement

Download a ready-to-use SaaS inventory and scoring template to find underused tools, measure value, and prioritize consolidation in 7 days.

Stop paying for tools that don't deliver: a practical SaaS inventory and scoring template for 2026

Operations leaders and small-business owners: if procurement cycles are slowing onboarding, bills are ballooning, or teams are confused about which tool to use — you have a stack problem, not a people problem. This guide gives you a ready-to-use SaaS inventory and scoring template plus a step-by-step method to find underused tools, quantify value, and prioritize vendor consolidation.

Why this matters now (2026)

Late 2025 and early 2026 accelerated two permanent shifts that change how you should inventory SaaS: usage-based pricing and AI-enabled feature consolidation. Vendors are unbundling legacy suites into metered services and simultaneously adding AI features that appear to replace adjacent tools. That makes historical spend alone a misleading signal — you must combine usage telemetry, integration footprint and business impact to decide what stays.

Marketing and operations teams often find 20–40% of their subscription spend tied to tools with minimal active usage — it’s the silent tax on productivity and procurement.

The evolution of SaaS inventory in 2026: what’s new

  • FinOps for SaaS is mainstream. Finance and procurement expect actionable metrics, not invoices.
  • AI-assisted discovery can ingest single-sign-on and API logs to flag low-usage licenses faster — but human validation is still required.
  • Composable ecosystems mean higher overlap risk: several best-of-breed tools now replicate features previously unique to suites.
  • Security and compliance require inventory fields for data sensitivity and third-party attestations (SOC2, ISO 27001) — see privacy and trust reviews to set sensible gating rules.

Download the SaaS inventory & scoring template

Use the CSV/Google Sheets template below to map vendor, usage, cost and overlap. Paste it into a new Google Sheet or Excel workbook and follow the steps later in this article to run scores and prioritization.

Download template (CSV)

Quick copy: headers to paste into a sheet:

Vendor,Tool Name,Category,Owner,Active Users,License Count,Monthly Cost,Annual Cost,Primary Integrations,Data Sensitivity,SLA (Hrs),Usage Score,ROI Score,Overlap With,Notes

What fields mean (and why they matter)

  • Vendor / Tool Name / Category — Basic taxonomy for grouping and consolidating.
  • Owner — Single accountable person for buyer conversations and validation.
  • Active Users — Count of users with meaningful activity in last 90 days (not license allocations).
  • License Count — Total seats purchased; necessary for utilization metrics.
  • Monthly / Annual Cost — Normalize to monthly for comparison across billing cycles.
  • Primary Integrations — How many downstream systems consume this tool’s data; indicates integration risk. If this includes your CRM, follow integration checklists like CRM integration guides.
  • Data Sensitivity — Low/Medium/High: helps prioritize security and compliance implications.
  • SLA (Hrs) — Vendor SLA or time-to-resolution; useful when weighing consolidation vs. redundancy.
  • Usage Score & ROI Score — Calculated indicators (rules provided below) to quantify value.
  • Overlap With — Names of tools with overlapping features; start here for consolidation candidates.

How the scoring works — formulas you can paste into Sheets

The template uses an additive score combining usage, cost-efficiency, integration footprint and business impact. Paste these sample formulas into your sheet columns and adapt thresholds to your organization.

1) Usage Rate (helps identify underused tools)

Formula (sheet cell):

=IF(License_Count=0,0,Active_Users/License_Count)

Google Sheets example if Active Users in column E and License Count in F:

=IF(F2=0,0,E2/F2)

2) Cost per Active User

Monthly cost divided by active users. If active users = 0, treat as high-cost risk.

=IF(E2=0,Monthly_Cost,Monthly_Cost/E2)

Interpreting results: Cost-per-active-user > support team benchmark (e.g., $100/user/mo) signals opportunity for seat reallocation or cancellation.

3) Usage Score (0–100)

Normalized from Usage Rate so 1.0 → 100 and 0 → 0. Example:

=MIN(100,ROUND((E2/F2)*100,0))

4) ROI Score (0–100)

Combine qualitative business impact with quantitative cost-efficiency:

  1. Business Impact (0–50): Owner rates 0–50 based on strategic importance.
  2. Cost Efficiency (0–50): Inverse of cost-per-active-user normalized to benchmark.
=Business_Impact + Cost_Efficiency

Example cost-efficiency: if benchmark is $100/user/mo, then Cost_Efficiency = MAX(0,50 - (Cost_per_Active_User/Benchmark)*50)

5) Overlap Index

Count of overlapping tools weighted by duplicate feature severity (1–3). Use this to build a redundancy column.

=SUM(Overlap_Weights)

Step-by-step — run a full SaaS inventory in 7 days

  1. Day 1: Centralize procurement records — export vendor invoices, credit card feeds, procurement platform data into one sheet. Tag by cost center.
  2. Day 2: Pull telemetry — gather SSO logs, active directory, API keys and service logs to measure activity per user. Where telemetry is unavailable, use owner interviews.
  3. Day 3: Enrich with integrations and data sensitivity — add how many downstream systems consume the data and whether it stores PII or regulated data.
  4. Day 4: Apply scoring — paste formulas from the template and generate Usage, ROI, and Overlap scores.
  5. Day 5: Validate with owners — review low-usage/high-cost items with owners to capture planned initiatives (sunsetting, migration, or renewed buy-in).
  6. Day 6: Prioritize actions — bin tools into Keep, Optimize, Cancel, Consolidate.
  7. Day 7: Execute low-effort wins — reclaim unused licenses, reassign seats, cancel redundant subscriptions with near-term savings. For practical reclaim and license strategies, see resources on advocating for leaner stacks (too many tools).

How to identify underused tools (practical signals)

Look beyond raw invoices. Use these signals together to reduce false positives:

  • Low usage rate: Active users/licensed seats < 30% for more than 60 days.
  • High cost-per-active-user: Above internal benchmark (finance should set this; often $50–$150/month depending on function).
  • High overlap index: Two or more similar tools used by same team or integrated into the same workflows.
  • No integrations or exports: Tools that are manually used without API or data exports are likely tactical and replaceable.
  • Single owner, low advocacy: If the owner cannot demonstrate 90-day business outcomes, treat as at-risk.

Example calculation (simplified)

Tool A: 10 active users, 100 licenses, $1,000/mo. Usage rate = 0.1 (10%). Cost-per-active-user = $1000/10 = $100. Usage score = 10. If business impact rated 10/50, cost efficiency = 0 (at benchmark), ROI score = 10. This tool is a candidate for license reclamation or consolidation.

Prioritizing consolidation: the triage matrix

Use a 2x2 matrix with Impact (business impact & risk) on the Y axis and Effort (migration complexity, integrations) on the X axis.

  • High Impact, Low Effort — fast consolidation wins (cancel redundant subscriptions, reassign seats).
  • High Impact, High Effort — strategic migrations that require planning (migrate data to single CRM). For migration and cloud pipeline planning, see a case study on scaling pipelines at cloud pipelines case study.
  • Low Impact, Low Effort — cancel or let expire.
  • Low Impact, High Effort — deprioritize or replace via vendor negotiation if needed.

Negotiation plays once you have the inventory

  • Bundle renewal discounts by combining remaining seat counts across business units.
  • Ask for usage-based caps or pause options for seasonal tools.
  • Request credits for overlapping functionality if moving to the vendor's broader suite.

Case study (anonymized): mid-market consolidation in 2025

One regional services firm we worked with completed a 10-day inventory in Q4 2025. Findings:

  • 120 unique SaaS subscriptions; 35 had usage rates under 20%.
  • After validation, they reclaimed 420 licenses and cancelled 9 redundant tools.
  • Immediate annualized savings were 27% on the audited portfolio, with an expected 6–9 month ROI when including reduced support overhead.

Key to success: combining telemetry with owner interviews to avoid cancelling tools that were in pilot or scheduled for migration.

Advanced strategies & 2026 predictions for operations teams

  • Policy-as-data: Expect procurement platforms to offer policy engines that auto-approve tools meeting your security and ROI thresholds. See preparedness guidance for SaaS platforms at outage & platform readiness.
  • AI discovery: Machine-learning classifiers will surface 'ghost subscriptions' (unused but billed) and suggest consolidation paths — keep ML pitfalls in mind (see ML patterns and pitfalls).
  • Vendor marketplaces: Marketplaces and integrated billing will let you consolidate procurement and reduce the number of direct vendor relationships.
  • Usage-first contracting: Contracts will increasingly include tiered caps, pause windows, and consumption reviews — negotiate them proactively.
  • Interoperability governance: API contracts and data contracts will determine whether two tools can be consolidated without breaking downstream processes.

Operationalizing the inventory: governance and handoffs

  1. Assign a SaaS steward per business unit — accountable for the inventory row and owner validation.
  2. Quarterly review cadence — refresh usage metrics, validate pilots, and publish a procurement watchlist.
  3. Integrate with finance — map the inventory to GL codes to track realized savings and reallocate budgets.
  4. Security gating — block new purchases for categories that already have a strategic vendor until review. For security gating examples and privacy vetting, consult vendor reviews like ShadowCloud Pro.

Measuring success

Track these KPIs post-inventory:

  • Subscription churn rate (reduced)
  • Percentage of spend on high-ROI tools
  • Time-to-onboard new tools (should decrease after consolidation)
  • Number of vendor relationships (target a strategic reduction percent)

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

  • Cancelling before validation: Always validate with owners and review integration dependencies.
  • Relying on invoices only: Invoices don't show active usage; pair with SSO or AD telemetry. For local testing and zero-downtime ops tooling that supports safe migrations, see hosted-tunnel tooling at ops tooling field reports.
  • Ignoring qualitative value: Some low-usage tools are mission-critical for niche workflows — capture business impact scores.

Actionable takeaways

  • Run a 7-day inventory using the template above — start with tools > $500/month and those flagged by SSO as inactive.
  • Use Usage Rate + Cost-per-Active-User to triage candidates for license reclamation.
  • Prioritize High Impact / Low Effort consolidations first to generate momentum and budget.
  • Implement a quarterly governance cadence and integrate with finance for measurable outcomes.

Next steps — get the template and start the audit

Download the CSV at the link above and paste into Sheets or Excel. If you want a pre-built Google Sheets version with formulas and a dashboard, contact our operations team to get a copy or request a 30-minute template walkthrough.

Need help executing a consolidated audit? Schedule a vendor audit or pilot a FinOps-for-SaaS review with our team to identify immediate savings and reduce procurement friction. For migration planning and cloud pipeline examples, check this cloud pipelines case study.

Ready to eliminate waste and optimize your stack? Download the template, run the 7-day inventory, and book a walkthrough if you want a turnkey dashboard and negotiation playbook.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#tools#SaaS#operations
U

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-17T01:50:02.212Z